Imagine Brisbane is about to be exposed to a new virus, which is expected to kill 600 people.1
Two alternative programs to combat the disease will bring about the following consequences
If Program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved.
If Program B is adopted, there is a one-third probability that 600 people will be saved and a two-thirds probability that no people will be saved.
Write down which program you would choose.
Imagine Brisbane is about to be exposed to a new virus, which is expected to kill 600 people.
Two alternative programs to combat the disease will bring about the following consequences
If Program C is adopted, 400 people will die.
If Program D is adopted, there is a one-third probability that nobody will die and a two-thirds probability that 600 people will die.
Write down which program you would choose.
Samara Aktari is a regular customer in your pharmacy.
Samara is 35 and dotes on her three children, aged 11, 10 and 7.
Samara suffers regular migraines and depression. Samara presents to the pharmacy with a prescription for the following treatments
You have some concerns regarding her medication use. Samara uses quite a few pain medications, and seems to rely on benzodiazepines for sleep and anxiety.
Dispensed | Drug | Dose |
---|---|---|
14/08/2024 | Amitriptyline Tablets 50mg, 50 | 1 n mdu |
14/08/2024 | Tramadol SR 200mg, 10 | 1 d |
14/08/2024 | Mersyndol Forte 20 | 1–2 tds prn |
11/08/2024 | Zolpidem 10mg, 14 | 1 n mdu |
11/08/2024 | Tramadol SR 200mg, 10 | 1 d |
7/08/2024 | Amitriptyline Tablets 50mg, 50 | 1 n mdu |
7/08/2024 | Mersyndol Forte 20 | 1–2 tds prn |
7/08/2024 | Diazepam Tablet 5mg, 50 | 1 d mdu |
5/08/2024 | Tramadol SR 200mg, 10 | 1d |
30/07/2024 | Tramadol SR 200mg, 10 | mdu |
28/07/2024 | Amitriptyline Tablets 50mg, 50 | mdu |
28/07/2024 | Mersyndol Forte 20 | 1–2 tds prn |
28/07/2024 | Nitrazepam Tablet 5mg, 25 | 1 d prn |
24/07/2024 | Tramadol SR 200mg, 10 | 1d |
Are there any ethical issues in dispensing Samara’s medications?
Will you dispense Samara’s medications?
Jenny is 52 years old, she is short-sighted and has worn glasses since she was a child. She has a healthy diet and doesn’t have cataracts or macular degeneration.
She asks you for a supplement that will assist her eye-health.
One of the pharmacy assistants over hears Jenny’s request and recommends Blackmores Macu-Vision Plus, suggesting that research has shown it to be beneficial for eye health.
The information provided with the product is:
Macu-Vision(R) Plus is a vitamin, mineral and antioxidant eyes formula that provides nutrients important to the macula. It incorporates two new ingredients - lutein and zeaxanthin – which help protect the macula from oxidative damage.
Jenny thanks you for the advice and buys the product.
The pharmacy assistant’s advice is misleading.
A formulation like that used in Macu-Vision Plus has been shown to be beneficial for people with diagnosed age-related macular degeneration.
There is no evidence supplements like Macu-Vision Plus:
The formulation contains high-doses of several nutrients linked to eye health. The link above provides information regarding adverse effects.
Truth-telling and avoiding misleading statements is implicit in many ethical the professional responsibilities. It is part of respecting autonomy.
Pharmacists have a responsibility for what they say as well as for the advice staff in the pharmacy provide.
Pharmacists have a responsibility to provide evidence-based advice.
Some relevant professional guidance:
PSA Code of Ethics, Integrity Principle 1
provides accurate, truthful, relevant and independent information in a form that is appropriate for and not misleading to patients
…
will only purchase, supply or promote any medicine, complementary medicine, herbal remedy or other healthcare product where there is credible evidence of efficacy and the benefit outweighs the risk
There are limitations on the indications that products listed on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods can make.
Check the details (the key studies are AREDS and AREDS2).
Clarify the evidence with staff.
This example is a modified version of the “Asian Disease” case discussed by Kahneman (2011, 367).↩︎